The US President Donald Trump said Washington is under “no weight” to accomplish an exchange manage China as the possibility of new levies linger.
The remarks come in the midst of reports the opposite sides could continue converses with fight off a third round of US duties.
China respected the offer of talks and said the two nations were examining the points of interest, as per reports.
The US has propelled an exchange war against China which could see the majority of its fares to the US subject to obligations.
“We are under no strain to make an arrangement with China, they are experiencing strain to make an arrangement with us,” Mr Trump said in a tweet on Thursday.
“Our business sectors are flooding, theirs are crumbling.”
US-China exchange push: What has happened up until now?
The early casualties of Trump’s exchange war
Six different ways China could strike back in an exchange war
The US and China have slapped levies on $50bn of each other’s merchandise this year in a raising exchange war between the world’s two biggest economies.
The levies are the most recent Trump strategy to challenge the facilitated commerce framework which has won for a considerable length of time.
They are as of now influencing organizations, especially the vehicle business, and harming economies.
Mr Trump said a week ago he could move “soon” to force taxes on an extra $200bn (£153bn) worth of items with charges on another $267bn “prepared to go without prior warning”.
In the event that the two arrangements of taxes proceed it would mean for all intents and purposes the majority of China’s US fares would be liable to new levies.
“The [US] organization sees taxes as a method for getting the consideration of the Chinese initiative and expanding their use at the arranging table,” Michael Froman, previous US exchange agent told the BBC.
“I don’t think the burden of taxes are a savvy move since it’s an expense, it’s an assessment on the shopper eventually. It’s additionally exceptionally problematic to organizations who are endeavoring to oversee worldwide supply chains.”